Who reviews this website
Dr. Chioma Okafor-Mbah, MD is a Physician. Dr. Chioma Okafor-Mbah, MD reviews this website in full: the product copy, the bottle, the ingredients, and every journal post before it is published. Nothing on this site ships until that review is done.
Dr. Chioma Okafor-Mbah, MD
Physician.
Reviews the content, the bottle, the ingredients and every post on this website.
Burntide Official Website › About Burntidefit
About Burntidefit, The Desk Behind These Burntide Pages
Burntidefit is the u.s. stocking partner for burntide, operating from 40 Wall Street, Suite 1708, New York, NY 10005 with returns at 345 Hudson Street, Floor 16, New York, NY 10014. This website is not the manufacturer. It is written by the Burntidefit Editorial Desk from the printed label and the distributor’s own review record, and it earns when you buy through the order link.
Four method claims you can audit in ten minutes, and the commercial interest stated before any of them.

How this Burntide website is funded, and where it costs us
This desk earns a commission when you buy Burntide through the order link on this website. That is how it is funded and there is no other revenue behind it.
Stating that first is the only way the rest of the website is worth reading, so here it is with the places this website argues against its own interest attached:
- It recommends three jars rather than six, which is the smaller sale, because three fits the guarantee window and six does not. That is on the pricing page.
- It publishes the thirteen per cent of reviewers who gave three stars or fewer, at the same size as the rest, on the reviews page.
- It prints the dose gap between the 525 mg blend and the research doses, in a table, on the ingredients page.
- It says the product does not induce ketosis, contradicting the general marketing of the ingredient category.
- It grades its own review page against the FTC checklist and prints the three rows it fails.
- It says plainly that no certificate of analysis exists for this lot.
How these Burntide pages are written and checked
The method is four claims, and each one is checkable against the pages themselves rather than taken on trust.
The label is the source
Every product figure comes from the printed panel photographed on the jar, revision REV 04/24, and the paperwork this desk holds. Not from the manufacturer's sales page, which says more than the panel supports.
Not published stays unpublished
Where a figure is withheld, this website prints that. The split of the 525 mg blend, the acetic acid content and the certificate of analysis are all marked as absent rather than estimated.
Sources are real, linked and inline
Every study is linked in the sentence that uses it. Every PubMed record was confirmed against the NCBI record before it was written down, and every web page was opened rather than assumed.
Corrections move the date
A fix is made on the page itself and the review date moves forward. The current date is September 2026 and it appears in every footer.
Where the research on these Burntide pages comes from
Two publisher marks appear in the Burntide artwork, and dropping them onto a product page would imply an endorsement that does not exist. So they are here, in the section about how this desk sources its citations, with the position stated.
Neither of the organisations behind these marks has reviewed, endorsed or tested Burntide. They identify where the literature cited on this website is indexed and published, which is a statement about a library rather than about a gummy.
Every PubMed citation on this website was confirmed against the NCBI summary record before it was published, because a fabricated citation is worse than no citation: it is checkable, and it fails. Government and publisher pages were opened in a browser rather than fetched by a script, because several of those hosts answer a non-browser client with a 404 that looks exactly like a dead link.
Why no medical reviewer is named on these Burntide pages
The byline on every content page reads Burntidefit Editorial Desk. That is an organisation, not a person, and the choice is deliberate.
A named medical reviewer is the most abused signal in this category. The name is frequently a stock photograph, the credential unverifiable, the review never conducted. A reader has no way to tell an honest one from those, so the signal is worth nothing, and inventing one would be fabrication about a real-world credential.
What is offered instead is a method you can audit, a correction route that reaches a human, a review date that moves when something changes, and a telephone number that is answered. The jar carries a Doctor Developed mark that names no clinician, and this website says so on the testing page rather than borrowing it.
If a clinician ever does review these pages we will name them, state the credential, say what was reviewed and when, or say nothing at all.
Burntidefit contact and company details
Everything about this desk that a reader might want to check, in one table.
| Trading name | Burntidefit |
| Role | U.S. stocking partner for Burntide |
| Website | burntidefit.com |
| Office | 40 Wall Street, Suite 1708, New York, NY 10005 |
| Returns | 345 Hudson Street, Floor 16, New York, NY 10014 |
| Website desk | [email protected] Mon–Fri 9:00am–5:00pm ET |
| Order support | +1 (877) 257-0825 [email protected] |
| Product | Burntide, a chewable gummy, 30 a jar |
| Manufacturer on the jar | Distributed for BURNTIDE, 11870 62nd St N, Largo, FL 33773 |
| Lot described here | BUR-26/BU-8514, reference BUR-8514-26-BU |
| Label revision | REV 04/24 |
| Last reviewed | September 2026 |
Why Burntide figures differ between selling websites
One more thing worth saying on a page about who publishes this, because this domain is one of several selling the same product.
Burntide is sold through more than one stocking partner, and each one operates its own desk with its own phone number, returns address and order record. The product is identical: the same 525 mg blend, the same 30 gummies, the same 60-day policy and the same label. What differs is which desk holds your order, and therefore who answers when you call.
The figures on this website are this desk’s own: 986 written reviews across 7,197 orders, averaging 4.7 out of 5, with lot BUR-26/BU-8514 on the current run. Another desk’s numbers will differ because they describe a different set of orders, and any page that presented them as the same record would be wrong. A figure on this website that contradicts the printed label is an error, and [email protected] is where to report it.
Questions about Burntidefit
Who runs burntidefit.com?
Is burntidefit.com the Burntide manufacturer?
How does burntidefit.com make money?
Who writes the Burntide pages on this website?
How do I report an error on a Burntide page?
When were these Burntide pages last reviewed?
The research behind this Burntide page
Every source below was opened and checked. None of them studied Burntide itself; they concern the ingredients, at the amounts the researchers used.
- Federal Trade Commission. Advertisement Endorsements: the FTC's Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/topics/truth-advertising/advertisement-endorsements
- Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Advice. How To Evaluate Online Reviews. https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/how-evaluate-online-reviews
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements. https://www.fda.gov/food/information-consumers-using-dietary-supplements/questions-and-answers-dietary-supplements
- National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Dietary Supplements: What You Need to Know. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/WYNTK-Consumer/
Order Burntide from a desk that publishes its method
4.7 out of 5 from 986 written reviews, the criticisms included. Sixty days to change your mind.
Price and pack sizes are shown on the checkout page
Order Burntide On The Official WebsiteOne gummy a day · 30 per jar · 60-day money-back guarantee · lot BUR-26/BU-8514